InsertChat vs Microsoft Copilot: GDPR-Compliant Alternative
Copilot-style tools are often focused on in-editor or productivity workflows. InsertChat focuses on deploying agents on your website with grounding, tools, and integrations for team workflows.
7-day free trial · Cancel anytime
InsertChat strengths
Website embedsKnowledge baseTool enablementIntegrations
Copilot is known for
In-editor assistanceDeveloper productivityMicrosoft ecosystemCoding workflows
Production agents
beyond the editor
Deploy agents for customers and teams with one consistent workspace.
Deploy anywhere
Use embeds, workspace, and API.
Grounded answers
Answer from your sources, not guesses.
Integrations
Connect Zendesk, HubSpot, and commerce tools.
Visibility
Track usage and improve over time.
Quick comparison
at a glance
A simple view of what each product is primarily built for. Availability can vary by plan and setup.
| Feature | InsertChat | Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge sources | Web, docs, YouTube, structured data | Varies by product |
| Deployment channels | Bubble or window embed | Not a website embed platform |
| Integrations | Zendesk, HubSpot, commerce tools | Varies by plan |
| Model access | Multiple models in one workspace | Varies by provider |
| Branding | Custom branding and themes | Limited |
| Security | Roles, scoped workspaces, deletable history | Varies by vendor |
What teams choose
when they switch
Outcome-focused reasons teams move to a workspace approach.
- A faster decision on what to use for your workflow
- A clear setup path for your team and your website
- More control over knowledge, tools, and deployments
- A workspace approach instead of one‑off chat tools