InsertChat vs Calendly
Calendly is focused on scheduling. InsertChat adds a full agent layer: answer questions from your knowledge, capture intent, then book when it makes sense.
7-day free trial · Cancel anytime
InsertChat strengths
Website embedsKnowledge baseTool enablementIntegrations
Calendly is known for
Scheduling linksAvailabilityRoutingAutomations
Answer, qualify, then book
in one flow
Turn questions into meetings without stitching tools together.
Grounded answers
Answer from your pages and docs as a source of truth.
Lead capture
Collect contact details and intent during chat.
Calendar booking
Offer scheduling when intent is high.
Embeds
Deploy a branded widget experience on key pages.
A quick way to decide
what fits
Pick based on whether you need an agent workflow or just scheduling.
Choose InsertChat when you want answers + lead capture + booking in one flow.
Choose InsertChat when you need a deployed agent on your website.
Choose Calendly when you primarily need scheduling links and routing.
Use InsertChat when you want booking triggered by conversation intent.
Quick comparison
at a glance
A simple view of what each product is primarily built for. Availability can vary by plan and setup.
| Feature | InsertChat | Calendly |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge sources | Web, docs, YouTube, structured data | Varies by product |
| Deployment channels | Bubble or window embed | Varies by product |
| Integrations | Zendesk, HubSpot, commerce tools | Varies by plan |
| Model access | Multiple models in one workspace | Not core |
| Branding | Custom branding and themes | Varies |
| Security | Roles, scoped workspaces, deletable history | Varies by vendor |
What teams choose
when they switch
Outcome-focused reasons teams move to a workspace approach.
- A faster decision on what to use for your workflow
- A clear setup path for your team and your website
- More control over knowledge, tools, and deployments
- A workspace approach instead of one‑off chat tools